Mahón, January 22, 2026
In a country whose border is largely defined by its coastline, its defense must be based on protecting its shores, strengthening the protection of the most vulnerable points where an attack and landing could take place.
At the beginning of the 19th century, after the War of Independence, Spain faced the problem that the lack of an adequate navy and the dilapidated state of its military fortifications forced it to focus its economic efforts on building a new coastal defense system that combined fortifications and artillery.
A large part of the fortifications in Spain were destroyed, not so much by the actions of the French enemy, but by the destructive work carried out by the British “allies.” All of this was done with the aim of eliminating future military obstacles and commercial competition (considering the unnecessary destruction of factories and workshops that took place).
During the first half of the 19th century, the bombardment of cities from ships became widespread. Despite improvements in ships and their artillery, the methods were still quite ineffective and rudimentary. Naval artillery was inaccurate due to the natural movement of the sea, and large sailing ships maneuvered while being towed by steamships, making them highly vulnerable to artillery fire.
For effective coastal defense, several conditions were necessary: fortifications to protect artillery from heavy-caliber fire; powerful artillery capable of matching the range of well-armed ironclads; and a fortified defensive infrastructure capable of housing sufficient troops to halt and repel land attacks against friendly artillery. Given these conditions, coastal artillery is superior to naval artillery.


